I hope Webroot Company accept my sugestion for create direct download link for webroot mobile security for android .
other most valid security companies Same Trend Micro & Symantec have direct link for mobile Security .
it is very better for webroot customers .
for example : hxxp://xxx.trendmicro.com/mobiledownload
any time users visit this link , can download latest version mobile security .
if have more than 1 product , better create more link .
Thank You .
Best Regards ,
One thing I would like to see changed or added to the Webroot movile app if the feature to send the device location when the batter level reached a low level.
This would be useful when a device is misplaced while turned on. As the battery gets low, it woudl reach a certain low level where the Webroot app woudl send the location automatically to the console. The user would just log in to the console and if the battery is dead, the last known location would still show up as it would be logged just before the battery died.
Just wondering if it would be a useful option to provide the user who overrides a Web Treat Shield Notification, i.e., clicks 'Unblock page & continue', to have theoption to file a URL Reputation Change Request at that point by providing at least a link to the relevant web page at BrightCloud?
It could be made smarter/slicker if on taking the 'Unblock page & continue' the user was automatically presented with the option on a chose or leave basis before proceeding to the requested web page.
We get a lot of requests for advice on how to deal with what the user believes is an improper blcok and such fucntinality would allow them to place the request quickly/easily.
Again, just a thought re. the improved usability of the product.
My reason for posting this is to suggest that you add something to the hard copy installation instructions and your CD/download installs that tells your users that they need to remove their old version before they can install and register their new version. My experience today in installing the new version was rather frustrating to say the least. I'm getting older
and it didn't register right away that I went thru this last year. I had to go online to confirm what I needed to do. More time and effort. Trying to install a newer version without removing the old one first is very confusing.
How about putting something in the installation script with an option to remove it now? "FYI. YOU'VE GOT AN EXISTING COPY. YOU MUST REMOVE IT BEFORE YOU CAN INSTALL THE NEW VERSION. DO YOU WANT TO REMOVE IT NOW?
I worked support many years ago and tested new software and wrote/edited installation proceedures. We did everything we could to make it a "no brainer" to avoid support calls. It's got to be really frustrating for some people and this must
surely generate a lot of support calls and internet inquiries.
Feel free to let me know what you think!
I think it would be a great idea to have to option to backup our custom user whitelist, including the web shield whitelist (I myself have allowed a few sites that the web shield thinks are suspicious), and the settings of the customer end client itself. This would be very useful if the user wanted to have the same whitelist on another computer as he does on one computer, and the same settings, or in the case of a reinstall; however, I feel the most usefulness would probably be from being able to back up the whitelist to the cloud, that way we don't have to add all the websites or files we have allowed on one computer to another, or re-add them if we needed to reinstall Windows for some reason. Also, we could also have the option to back up our user added file blocklist as well as our whitelist.
Powered by dragging the file CHROME_18.104.22.168.crx & lpchrome.crx
Checked with Comodo Dragon and Yandex.Browser
If it works in browsers based on Chromium, then you need to make an auto-install plug-in
Adding SafeStart Sandbox context menu would be very handy addition, if you run an unknown program
Can be realized in the future start automatically unknown files in the sandbox or with limited rights
I plan to get one in the future so I would love it if (and so would others probably) if you could add av support for linux ubuntu.
Ubuntu is the most common out there and the easiest. (so I would expect a lot of people to get that one if any of them.) I am sure you could do a great job if you know enough about them. (which I am fairly certain wouldn't be hard for your team)
Thanks in advance
actually on second all of them, I may use gentoo though.
edit edit: not that it matters but maybe mint. (I hear that even linux can get viruses hence why i would like webroot to support it. if possible.)
Feel free to chime in if you think this is unnessescary or needed or for whatever reason you may have. (as long as its not harsh)
Recently I tested ESET AV 7. ESET comes built with an option to detect PUAs, but their database is very good. Not only is the database good, but if you try to install a known good program (such as: Utorrent, Java, ...etc) with bloatware, crapware, PUAs...ESET will automatically filter (block) the PUA wrappers attached and allow only the good program in install. I tested this and it works great.
Come on WSA, lets fix the bundled crapware circulating around the internet. I'm tired of fixing slow, bloated PCs. Sometimes, I'd rather have real malware. At least it stays hidden most of time. JK
While cleaning, it displays the size of the files cleaned in bytes, very confusing...
Can we please have them make it in MB ? much easier to comprehend IMHO
Also, if a detailed results at the end of the scan is shown it would be great, like how CCleaner shows you a summary of what it cleaned and how much space from each category was cleaned
Having the ability to delete qurantined items form the End Protection Console would save a lot of time and make monitoring of all clients much clearer.
In Endpoint Reports, if you have a large Group you run a report on e.g. 'undetermined software' it should display how many pages have been returned e.g. page 1 of 10. Currently you have no idea how many records have been returned.
Secondly to that, there should be a 'go to page #' option so you can jump through the pages more quickly.
Also a very important thing to fix is when you sort by a field, e.g. Hostname, it's only sorts the result page you are on and not the whole recordset the query has returned. You'd find that results that should be displayed on page 1 are displaying on other pages.
these little features/fixes will make it much easier
If you're already allowing the user to disable components of your software protection, i think we can safely presume the user should be smart enough to disable the "security dissabled" warnings, if they wish to.
This would satisfy those users who wish for those components to remain disabled and still show a "fully protected" experience when using the software.
WSA engineers can add double or even triple authentication messages the user will have to allow. This would certainly make the user aware of the choice being made. Or, perhaps, WSA engineers could show an alert on a weekly basis that components are disabled.
Bitdefender av allows this as does Bull Guard and a one other I can not remember. Thank you!
When viewing pictures online it is in detail view and there is no picture next to file name.If i want to download a picture i have no idea what that picture is unless i switch to image view(which i cant get image view to work).There should be a smal picture next to the file name.I have used several online backups and they all have this.