By Steven J. Vaughan-NicholsAugust 15, 2014 02:04 PM E
The patent wars keep going and going and we keep paying and paying.
Computerworld - When I started covering technology in the '80s, the last thing I thought I'd need to learn about was intellectual property law. But as Nicolai Tesla learned in his fight with Thomas Edison in the electrical-current patent wars of the 1890s, wherever technology goes, IP law is sure to follow.
My moment of revelation came in 2003, when I started covering SCO's copyright assault on Linux. SCO never really had a case, but I was soon to find out that with software patents, you really don't need a good case to profit.
You see, defending yourself against a serious patent attack is expensive -- expensive enough to make not defending yourself against a serious patent attack very desirable.
According to the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA), companies sued last year for patent infringement by a non-practicing entity (that and its acronym, NPE, are lawyerspeak for "patent troll") for less than a million dollars that decided to fight all the way through a trial spent an average of $820,000.
ComputerWorld/ full article here/ http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9250407/Steven_J._Vaughan_Nichols_Patent_trolls_under_attack_but_not_dead_yet
Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols: Patent trolls under attack, but not dead yet
Be the first to reply!
Already have an account? Login
Login to the community
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.