I couldn't help but noticed the general enthusiasm on this forum regarding some recent webroot reviews:
I am surprised though that nobody inquired about the methodology used for these reviews, number and samples used, etc.
When Webroot failed miserably AV Comparatives test everybody claimed that the test was not accurate, in real life is different, etc.
Now, when two obscure entities published their review (along with a link "Buy now") the enthusiasm is general. everybody is congratulating everybody and together Webroot; not a word about the methodology used, number of samples, type of sample, etc.
Best answer by JimMView original