I've read favorable reviews of the subject sites and they seem legit, so why are they flagged with the minus sign and exclamation signs in front of their seach listings? QuantConnect even has a github account. Have there been reports of anything nefarious with these sites? Any malicious links or payloads?
I'd like to visit these sites but I certainly don't want trouble.
Might these sites be flagged because they all have "quant" in their names?
Sorry if my questions seem stupid, I just don't know how the flagging works and whether it's a real threat. I'm hoping it's just a mistake. If it's true that these sites are indeed nefarious, will WebRoot still protect me against malicious links and payloads?
Why are quantconnect.com, quantopian.com, and quantquote.com flagged moderate risk or suspicious?
Already have an account? Login
Login to the community
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Welcome to the Community Forums.
A quick check over at www.brightcloud.com (URL / IP Lookup) reveals the following:
The boxed & arrowed informatiob explain the current reputation rating, i.e., they are relatively new & at present not seen as popular. I suspect that this is the same for the other 2 sites you mention.
I suspect that this will change over time but if you are minded to assist their reputation rating then you can lodge a request for it to be reviewed by submitting a URL Reputation Change Request over at brightcloud.com via this web page, the instructions on how to proceed are provided on the page.
I hope that helps?
I will follow your advice. I feel a lot better knowing it's just a lack of popularity and not something nefarious. 🙂
One can also get similar but less detailed information via a link in the WSA client:
Gear/cog symbol to right of Utilities tab > Reports tab > Submit a file...which will open a web page which is a Webroot Lookup page and on which there is a tab marked 'URL Reputation Lookup'.
Entering a URL in that provides the following lesser information, but it is still a useful facility if you want to check a site out before heading over to it:
Hope that helps further?
That is part of what we are here for...to learn and share all together.
Furthermore, Quantopian has over 80,000 registered users, a Github account with several popular open-source projects on it, many articles about it on news sites, and links to it from all over the internet, so it is hard to understand how BrightCloud categorizes its popularity as "Unknown".
In short, I don't think this reputation score is at all in any way reliable.
(Note: I work for Quantopian.)
Welcome to the Community Forums.
Thanks for your input...best approach if you would like to get the reputation score for the sites involved reviewed/changed etc., is to submit a URL Reputation Change Request to BrightCloud which you can do directly from this SITE.
I am sure that the BrightCloud Reputation Team will be pleased to receive your input/request.
Given the number of sites on the Web and the number of such incidents which we hear about, which are frankly very, very low indeed, I feel that BrightCloud does an excellent at safeguarding users.
There is no such thing as perfection in terms of this...and I have used a number of other reputation applications (which I will not name) and they have perfromed rather worse than BrightCloud...it is just unfortuante that a site that you are involved with has been caught up in this...and to correct this as quickly as possible the change request is the best approach.